> LK> there is a "bug" using the white space code, then don't use
 > LK> it.  Very simple.
 > Yes, that's good practical advice.  Unfortunately, Word has a few
 > things that do not work correctly when a table is involved.  The
 > classic example is inserting a table in the a series of numbered
 > paragraphs. The paragraph numbering is turned off by the table
 > insertion and there is no way to continue the paragraph numbering
 > after the table.
Whereas I know what you mean by "no way to continue," you *can* continue the 
numbering by using sequence fields.  However, it isn't the automatic 
numbering of Word 6 and/or 7.
I have tried several scenarios using numbering; overall, I am not totally 
impressed (in Word 6).  I don't particularlly like some of the "defaults" or 
just the characteristics of that feature.  Yes, I know that a lot ofthis can 
be configured--and permanently configured.  I just have not been convinced of 
the efficiency of the feature.  In some respects, I like the use of the 
sequence fields.  It appears a little easier to get the particular paragraphs 
to "look" the way I would like.
I realize that the above paragraph is a little obtuse, however, without going 
into a long explanation/description of the entire situation, I felt that this 
obtuseness would be a little better.
Lawrence
... Have you seen your RIP today?
--- FMail 1.0g
---------------