| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ATM Foucault testing an hyperbolic mirror? |
From: "James Lerch" To: "ATM List" Reply-To: "James Lerch" I can't offer any pointers to documentation, but I can recount a recent experience with a 6" F/2 sphere I tried testing. Using a slitless tester, the problem I ran into was I could not get the entire mirror to be illuminated. I could only get the center 50% illuminated, which showed an obvious null at ROC, but only for the center 50% of the mirror surface! It was almost like my light source wasn't big enough (anyone have any suggestions? I'm using a 5mm LED behind the knife) I'm currently thinking I'm going to need a point source light, like a LED/Laser pointer reflected of a Ball bearing (Or something) to test such a fast mirror surface. Of course this brings up an interesting question in my mind. The cause of the inability to fully illuminate the mirror at F/2, does this translate over to any possible error for slower mirrors? As for testing the hyperbolic surface, if you can get the mirror illuminated and get some zonal readings, you can use either Figure45 or Sixtests to reduce the data. Just enter the appropriate conic constant in either program. (BTW, if you enter the zonal measurements into Sixtests, the program will spit out a best fit conic constant as well, which I found rather handy for figuring an Oblate concave mirror I was making with a b of +2.3) Best of Luck! James Lerch http://lerch.no-ip.com/atm (My Telescope Construction Page) --- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.