* Reply to msg in LOCSYSOP
On 1996-03-02 11:25, Bill Grimsley of 3:640/305.9 wrote:
BG> Paul, at 01:17 on Mar 02 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley...
BG> Try false advertising, as their modems are NOT 100% ITU V.34-compliant.
PE> Care to quote from the ITU spec to prove that? If you can, I'll
PE> ask Netcomm to comment.
BG> I'd love to Paul, but the V.34 document is bloody hard to obtain. Arthur
BG> in Aust_Modems would be the best prospect, I'd imagine. Nonetheless, there
BG> are still certain aspects of the V.34 specs which NetComm (i.e. Rockwell)
BG> has so far chosen not to employ.
Arthur, do you know anything about these claims that Netcomm
doesn't conform to the V.34 spec? I have serious doubts about
that claim myself. BFN. Paul.
@EOT:
---
* Origin: X (3:711/934.9)
|