RB> Seems that 0019 is not as good as it used to be, as you said before
RB> and telstra 0011 is quite good now.

 DH> The word is that the fax processors have been "upgraded".
 DH> Read - stuffed up even more.  Modem interference is
 DH> significantly stepped up.

 DH> 0015 and 0019 are off the "use me" list.  0011 is much
better, however.

RB> I did not try 0015, I've wasted enough money this week.

 DH> Should be identical to 0019 now.

Funny (perhaps) at V.32bis I'm still doing better with 0015, whereas a week
of experimenting with 0011 led to some pretty dismal sessions, in one case
signal quality down to 3/7, occasioning what looked like 4800 or 7200bps
fallback.

I guess the fax processors, tuned for 14400 fax, are ok for V.32bis?

Cheers, Ian

--- MaltEd 1.0.b5