| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | ATM X-Mailer: Juno Webmail Version 1.0 |
To: atm{at}shore.net
From: kwhitefire{at}juno.com
Reply-To: kwhitefire{at}juno.com
I have a couple of questions regarding aplanatic reflactors.
Aplanats are telescopes with flat focal planes. This is a difficult
situation with mirrors. Add mirror #3 and the focal plane becomes
flattened more easily than with two mirrors.
I have devised several instruments of moderate size that have focal planes
in excess of 10,000 inches. Is this flatness close enough to aplanatic to
count?
One instrument I have designed has a field curvature of over 250 miles and
coma/astig near that of a Newtonian.
Another instrument I designed has a field curvature in excess of 86,000 inches.
The coma and astig are -.000020 and +.000046.
How flat a field do I need before I can call it an aplanat? These two
designs are both difficult-looking on the computer. The tolerances are
difficult at best. How difficult is it to work to a b of +/- .0005?
Kevin of Eastern Iowa
Seeker of the Darkness
________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com
--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.