TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: atm
to: ATM
from: kwhitefire{at}juno.com
date: 2002-12-15 08:38:04
subject: ATM X-Mailer: Juno Webmail Version 1.0

To: atm{at}shore.net
From: kwhitefire{at}juno.com
Reply-To: kwhitefire{at}juno.com


I have a couple of questions regarding aplanatic reflactors.

Aplanats are telescopes with flat focal planes.  This is a difficult
situation with mirrors.  Add mirror #3 and the focal plane becomes
flattened more easily than with two mirrors.

I have devised several instruments of moderate size that have focal planes
in excess of 10,000 inches.  Is this flatness close enough to aplanatic to
count?

One instrument I have designed has a field curvature of over 250 miles and
coma/astig near that of a Newtonian.

Another instrument I designed has a field curvature in excess of 86,000 inches.
 The coma and astig are -.000020 and +.000046.

How flat a field do I need before I can call it an aplanat?  These two
designs are both difficult-looking on the computer.  The tolerances are
difficult at best.  How difficult is it to work to a b of +/- .0005?

Kevin of Eastern Iowa
Seeker of the Darkness




________________________________________________________________
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com

--- BBBS/NT v4.00 MP
* Origin: Email Gate (1:379/1.100)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/1 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.