From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:szkd52qeu1e.fsf{at}eris.io.com, The Chief Instigator
 typed:
> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
>
>> In news:9cpo03977k467tcnr2n0dkqhai438p7d53{at}4ax.com,
>> Douglas Berry  typed:
>>> On  Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:51:11 -0400 there was an Ancient "John
>>> D.Wentzky"  who
stoppeth one in
>>> alt.atheism
>>>> In news:1175192005.583773.107660{at}n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
>>>> KTBpylon{at}gmail.com  typed:
>
>>>>>> Satellite and cable television are currently in violation of
>>>>>> Freedom of Speech.
>
>>>>> No, they aren't.
>
>>>> How does charging for speech satisfy freedom of speech
>>>> requirements?
>
>>> Johm first of all, the First Amendment on stops the government from
>>> muzzling your freedom of speech. Private companies can and do set
>>> policies restricting what employees may say while on the job.
>
>> Who cares about your illegal ideas that go against Freedom of SPeech?
>
> It's just a coincidence that the courts have upheld policies you're
> ranting about.
>
>> You, but not many others.
>
> Definitely not the billions of others in your defective head.

Oh. So you are admitting that billions are being stolen from.

>>> Next, charging for a service does not violate anyone's freedom of
>>> speech.
>
>> Charging for speech automatically makes that speech disqualified
>> from being considered free speech.
>
> Cite?

What school for idiots did you attend?

>> You know I am right.
>> Why are you resisiting?
>
> It takes very little to conclude that you are right on your way to
> spending the rest of your life in a state-operated funny farm...if
> you're lucky.

Lucky?
You resorting to luck again?

>>> The companies are providing a service, you are free to
>>> partake of it or not.
>
>> There is no right to charge for speech in the Constitution.
>
> There's no right for you to be insane in it, either.

Is that why you, as an insane person, think you have no rights?

[snip]

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag