| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Analog vs Digital |
"Tim Tyler" wrote in message
news:c9fpqn$19n4$1{at}darwin.ediacara.org...
> Perplexed in Peoria wrote or quoted:
> > "Tim Tyler" wrote in message
> > > Jim Menegay wrote or quoted:
>
> > > > The ideal digital bowling lane would slope toward the gutters
> > > > from the center (the threshold). And it is this "basin of
> > > > attraction" feature in the dynamics that
distinguishes digital
> > > > from analog.
> > >
> > > ...but surely analog systems can exhibit basins of attraction as well.
> >
> > But surely an IDEAL analog system will not. See my reply to John.
>
> Can't seem to find that reply.
Damn, the reply seems to have been lost by Google Groups. It was a
long one and I didn't save a copy. Dumb of me.
I will try to compose an equivalent response within the next few
days. I am currently busy searching the web for tutorials on
information theory - particularly as applied to analog signals.
So, my eventual response may be much better than the lost
original
In the meantime, the main thrust of my response to John was
that any discussion on these topics has to take place in
the context of Shannon's communication theory. That means:
1. That information theory inevitably carries a dose of
teleology - it is an engineering discipline, not a
branch of pure descriptive science. Of course,
Nature (natural selection) is also an engineer. A
central part of this is Shannon's idea of the active
channel.
2. Hence "analog" and "digital" cannot be understood without
taking into account someone's intention to communicate.
Analog and digital are names for two different strategies
for encoding information physically. They are not the
names for different physical situations.
3. That an ideal analog channel for sending digital information
deliberately introduces distortions in the analog signal
(the basins). But, an ideal analog channel for sending
analog information does not distort.
As background, I have found an online copy of Shannon's
original paper, which is worth reading even if you skip
over some of the math:
http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/paper.html
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com
---
* RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
* RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 6/1/04 6:50:24 AM
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.