From: "CafeWriter" 


"John D.Wentzky"  wrote in
message news:HVVOh.28702$68.18896{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net...
> In news:szkhcs3u5su.fsf{at}eris.io.com,
> The Chief Instigator  typed:
>> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
>>
>>> In news:8FUOh.87764$DN.8411{at}pd7urf2no,
>>> CafeWriter  typed:
>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in message
>>>> news:ssROh.21875$nV1.17948{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>>>> In news:SuHOh.85093$DN.81609{at}pd7urf2no,
>>>>> CafeWriter  typed:
>>>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in message
>>>>>> news:ipEOh.21628$nV1.20189{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>>>>>> In
news:1175091728.446228.99600{at}n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
>>>>>>> J Young  typed:
>>>>>>>> How dare anyone or any institution try to
suppress this young
>>>>>>>> man's First Amendment rights! Thank God
that this judge was such
>>>>>>>> a wise and insightful man; who knows how
many lives are being
>>>>>>>> saved by his ruling?
>>
>>>>>>> I think the Honorable Victoria Roberts is a
woman, there, JY.
>>>>>>> A very nice decision indeed.
>>>>>>> I am sure the public would be pleased to read
this ruling in
>>>>>>> their newspapers.
>>>>>>> And, I am sure that any opposing viewpoints
would be viewed with
>>>>>>> much consternation and suspicion into why
would anyone want to
>>>>>>> oppose such a ruling?
>>
>>>>>> I would welcome any suspicions and etc... because
I do oppose her
>>>>>> ruling.
>>>>>> Oh why would I want to oppose such a ruling? Well because it
>>>>>> basically takes away a woman's right to decide
whatever or not to
>>>>>> be a mother and change the status, making the
fetus to be more
>>>>>> important than women.
>>
>>>>> It does not regard the fetus as being more important than the
>>>>> woman, you hypocrite.
>>>>> Your stance is what regards women as more important than other
>>>>> members of humanity.
>>>>> You must submit or be dominated.
>>
>>>> No, I am not going to be a mother and I am going to stick to that
>>>> decision. Oh and to be ordered to submit to the other members of
>>>> humanity or be dominated... no thanks.
>>
>>> Oops.
>>> You mean to say you are content with pro-choice dominators telling
>>> you what to do?
>>
>> No, she's content to choose to be a mother when *she* wants to be.
>> You don't get any input into her decision, and neither do I - but
>> then, I know better than to interfere in something that isn't anyone
>> else's business (except for those she chooses to include in her
>> decision, which you most assuredly won't be).
>>
>>>> I'd rather be a single woman.
>>
>>>>>> Guess what, if a fetus cannot live without a
woman, what does that
>>>>>> makes it exactly?
>>
>>>>> Dependent and worthy of love.
>>
>>>> Then I am so happy that I got myself fixed because I do not want
>>>> children!!!
>>
>>> So, why are you against living in utero humanity if you can not get
>>> pregnant?
>>
>> Why are you a babbling maniac who's likely going to get to do some
>> time in prison?
>
> Likely to you is almost a guaranteed impossibility.
> All you criminal anti-liberty self-protection freaks are loading up for
> disaster.
>
>
No, pro-lifers or rather, anti-abortionists are loading up for disasters if
they are going to keep treating women like baby machines and thinking that
everything will be just fine when the child is born.

Guess what?  If that child is not wanted by the mother or the father, the
child will go into the foster care unless the private adoption have been
planned out prior to the child birth.  How many times must I tell you that
foster care is definitely not the best where I am?

I mean that there have been cases of children being murdered by their
foster parents and even their birth parents for many reasons that I can't
possibly list them all because it will go on and on.

Use common sense; not every person wants to be a mommy or daddy.  So before
you start protesting for the fetus' right, I have to ask you this rather
interesting question:  knowing that you wanted the fetus to survive, do you
want this child to go through a lifetime of possible abuse and all from
parents who do not want that child in the first place?  Is a life time of
endless pain really worth it?  What if the child is disabled?  Would the
life of horrifying pain be worth it?

That's the problem with the anti-abortionists.  The minute that the child
is born, they walk away, leaving the child alone and not giving a care what
happens to the child.  That is a shameful behaviour because if they really
do not want abortions to happen, they should become the child's adoptive
parents or they can help take care of the unwanted children.

Anti-abortionists, whatever you like it or not, there will always be
unwanted children and what are you going to do about it?  I mean think
about it before you open your mouth and say that abortions kill fetuses
when in reality, what happens in life would also kill them.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag