RD>    Of course, you're right in your assumptions, but in a different way.
RD>    People who collected frequency lists were considered "suspicious".
RD>    Why on earth would anyone NEED a list of police radio frequencies?
RD>    Kind of like folks do with guns now.  Well, I'm an AMERICAN for one
RD>    thing.  Second, as a human being, I have an inherent right to
RD>    monitor my duly-elected government to keep them honest.
       Well, after so many crooks have been caught with scanners, I can
       see the apprehension, as I could if someone owned a private
       business that used radios, and someone called to find out about
       frequencies. I guess the police think that as long as they do
       their job, why should anyone want to listen?
       (BTW, I am NOT advocating either side-just a thought!)
       Carlos Boquin
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
---------------