From: "CafeWriter" 


"John D.Wentzky"  wrote in
message news:KQUOh.21943$nV1.6029{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> In news:8FUOh.87764$DN.8411{at}pd7urf2no,
> CafeWriter  typed:
>> "John D.Wentzky" 
wrote in message
>> news:ssROh.21875$nV1.17948{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>> In news:SuHOh.85093$DN.81609{at}pd7urf2no,
>>> CafeWriter  typed:
>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in message
>>>> news:ipEOh.21628$nV1.20189{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>>>> In news:1175091728.446228.99600{at}n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
>>>>> J Young  typed:
>>>>>> How dare anyone or any institution try to suppress
this young
>>>>>> man's First Amendment rights! Thank God that this
judge was such
>>>>>> a wise and insightful man; who knows how many
lives are being
>>>>>> saved by his ruling?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the Honorable Victoria Roberts is a woman, there, JY.
>>>>> A very nice decision indeed.
>>>>> I am sure the public would be pleased to read this
ruling in their
>>>>> newspapers.
>>>>> And, I am sure that any opposing viewpoints would be viewed with
>>>>> much consternation and suspicion into why would anyone want to
>>>>> oppose such a ruling?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I would welcome any suspicions and etc... because I do oppose her
>>>> ruling.
>>>> Oh why would I want to oppose such a ruling? Well because it
>>>> basically takes away a woman's right to decide whatever or not to be
>>>> a mother and change the status, making the fetus to be more
>>>> important than women.
>>>
>>> It does not regard the fetus as being more important than the woman,
>>> you hypocrite.
>>> Your stance is what regards women as more important than other
>>> members of humanity.
>>> You must submit or be dominated.
>>
>> No, I am not going to be a mother and I am going to stick to that
>> decision. Oh and to be ordered to submit to the other members of
>> humanity or be dominated... no thanks.
>
> Oops.
> You mean to say you are content with pro-choice dominators telling you
> what to do?
>
>> I'd rather be a single woman.
>>
>>>
>>>> Guess what, if a fetus cannot live without a woman, what does that
>>>> makes it exactly?
>>>
>>> Dependent and worthy of love.
>>>
>> Then I am so happy that I got myself fixed because I do not want
>> children!!!
>
> So, why are you against living in utero humanity if you can not get
> pregnant?
>
>> Just for once get it in your tiny head that not every woman wants to
>> be a mother nor go through the horrifying labour.
>>
>> Don't even say "labour of love" because of course, it
involves blood
>> loss, etc...
>>
>> So get over it!!!
>
> Get over it when it is unconstitutional roevwadedom?
> How?
>
No, I just think that it's time to stop treating women like baby machines
because women can do much much more than just have children. 
Unfortunately, some of you cannot believe that could be true so that's why
I have my tubes snipped.  I'm a woman, I have no plans to be a mother, and
I do have plans for a better future, something I cannot do if I have a
child or worse, children.

I'm just a supporter of women's right to choice and some people look at it
like women's right to kill a fetus.  Unfortunately, I don't see it this way
because hey, if women keep on giving birth every single day, then we are in
big trouble.  No, I don't mean crimes, abuses, etc...  I mean the famous
case of the overpopulating the world.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag