On 18/07/17 14:18, Mike Scott wrote:
> On 18/07/17 13:54, Mike Scott wrote:
>> On 17/07/17 23:12, sean wrote:
>>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:42:36 +0100, Mike Scott wrote:
>>>> Otherwise it's running well enough - with pkg-static, I've got X11
>>>> installed, and the rpi is surprisingly speedy. I'd rather have a
>>>> replacement for tightvnc though (which is written with assembly code
>>>> :-(
>>>>   )
>>>
>>> What raspberry pi version are you running - 2 or 3?
>>> TightVNC is written with assembly code??
>>>
>> 3.
>>
>> Uses x86 assembler according to the 'package is broken' message from
>> the ports tree. I've not looked (yet), I admit.
>>
>>
> Just looked.... it has assembler code for 4 architectures to do
> efficient stippling:
> stipmips.s      stipple68k.s    stipsparc.s     stipsprc32.s

Although the real culprit seems to be compiler.h, chock full of __ASM__
directives for various architectures. Beyond my means to fix :-{



--
Mike Scott (unet2  [deletethis] scottsonline.org.uk)
Harlow Essex
"The only way is Brexit" -- anon.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05