From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:szkk5wzbuku.fsf{at}eris.io.com, The Chief Instigator
 typed:
> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
>
>> In news:szkmz1vlpoh.fsf{at}eris.io.com,
>> The Chief Instigator  typed:
>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 writes:
>
>>>> In news:szkps6ru667.fsf{at}eris.io.com,
>>>> The Chief Instigator  typed:
>>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 writes:
>
>>>>>> In news:460b3d71$0$14136$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net,
>>>>>> Ray Fischer  typed:
>>>>>>> J Young  wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> How dare anyone or any institution try to
suppress this young
>>>>>>>> man's First Amendment rights!
>
>>>>>>> You're pro-censorship.  You don't believe in
free speech.
>
>>>>>> I believe in Freedom of SPeech.
>
>>>>> You claim to, but your subsequent statements contradict your own
>>>>> proclamation.
>
>>>>>> Why don't you?
>>>>>> Satellite and cable television are currently in violation of
>>>>>> Freedom of Speech.
>
>>>>> Prove it.
>
>>>>>> Why is it the EU has free satellite television and
free satellite
>>>>>> radio? Why does canada have free digital radio?
>>>>>> Huh?
>
>>>>> Guess what, Sherlock...we have free digital radio in
this country.
>>>>> There are a number of Houston stations that broadcast
on a digital
>>>>> subchannel.
>
>>>> Cool.  Free market economics at work.
>
>>> Maybe you should shut up and actually learn, for once.
>
>> I knew about Ibiquity years ago.
>
> Ibiquity has nothing to do with it.
>
>>>>>> We are waiting for your answer.
>
>>>>> No one gives a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut what the voices
>>>>> in your head tell you.
>
>>>> You anti-liberty loons don't seem to care much about constitutional
>>>> government.
>
>>> More so than you've demonstrated (or are ever likely to
>>> demonstrate).
>
>> You gotta be kidding.
>
> Sorry, but your stupidity is still refused by the vast majority who
> read your tirades.
>
>>>>>> The people of the USA are sick of you ungenerous criminals
>>>>>> stealing their money illegally.
>
>>>>> The people of the USA will likely be a little safer,
after the end
>>>>> of your trial.
>
>>>> You mean the people will be safer if someone who isn't a threat to
>>>> anyone in this society, me, is wrongfully incarcerated or
>>>> sequestered to a mental health facility?
>
>>> You mean "rightly", since you're certifiable, given
your spew of the
>>> last few days.
>
>> Certifiably sane.
>
> Certifiably psychotic, you mean.

Nah.

>>>  No sane person would make some of the claims you have.
>
>> What claims?
>> Why is it you can not understand the law and how it is a tool to
>> adjudicate issues rather than acting as if everyone who actually
>> does understand the law is somehow insane?
>
> You can't be taken at your word, since you have demonstrated that you
> cannout reliably understand what you read.

Is that why my GRE verbal score disagrees with you?

>>>> Anti-liberty loon imaginations are what get you into such binds.
>
>>> You're the anti-liberty loon, indeed,
>
>> Not even close.
>
> You're just nuts.  End of story.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag