On 28/10/2019 08:05, Michiel van der Vlist -> David Drummond wrote:

 MvdV>>>> Are they charging for IPv4?

 AV>>> Had you expected anything else from these faggots? :-/

 DD>> Is there some connection between sexual proclivities and business
 DD>> practices in your part of the world?

 MvdV> Regarding IPv6, it could very well be. The difference between six and
 MvdV> sex is only one letter.

Hmm - I hadn't thought of that.

 MvdV> And now to something completely different: how is your IPv6? I see that
 MvdV> your node is only reachable via IPv4 at the moment. So what are your
 MvdV> plans? Does your ISP offer IPv6?

My node runs at another domicile. I don't know if IP6 is available there.

 MvdV> If not, are your planning a tunnel? Are you considering changing ISP?

No, neither of the above are in my control. I am not planning to re-home my 
node.

 MvdV> Tell us about your plans to make your node IPv6 capable.

None at the moment although I monitor this echo in case the situation changes. 
At this point I don't see any advantage to changing - other than to allow 
direct access from IP6 only nodes. The last direct access to my node from 
anyone was ...

I have surrendered my NC-ship just recently, my enthusiasm for Fidonet has 
seriously waned of late.

-- 

Regards
David

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0