On 18/07/17 13:54, Mike Scott wrote:
> On 17/07/17 23:12, sean wrote:
>> On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:42:36 +0100, Mike Scott wrote:
>>> Otherwise it's running well enough - with pkg-static, I've got X11
>>> installed, and the rpi is surprisingly speedy. I'd rather have a
>>> replacement for tightvnc though (which is written with assembly code :-(
>>>   )
>>
>> What raspberry pi version are you running - 2 or 3?
>> TightVNC is written with assembly code??
>>
> 3.
>
> Uses x86 assembler according to the 'package is broken' message from the
> ports tree. I've not looked (yet), I admit.
>
>
Just looked.... it has assembler code for 4 architectures to do
efficient stippling:
stipmips.s      stipple68k.s    stipsparc.s     stipsprc32.s

but no fallback for other architectures.

--
Mike Scott (unet2  [deletethis] scottsonline.org.uk)
Harlow Essex
"The only way is Brexit" -- anon.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05