RS> KK>   if(!c)
RS>   Is testing for a 'false pointer', ie, using the logical
RS>   NOT operator like you did above ANSI standard?
   No. It isn't. The NULL macro is standard, but the actual
   value of a NULL pointer is implementation defined.
   NULL and 0 are interchangeable in most C++ implementations,
   but I shouldn't have used it thusly in C. Force of habit.

> ] Within every pearl there lies a tiny grain of truth.........

---