From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:szkhcs2eu81.fsf{at}eris.io.com, The Chief Instigator
 typed:
> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
>
>> In news:szkwt0z2t8q.fsf{at}eris.io.com,
>> The Chief Instigator  typed:
>>> Douglas Berry  writes:
>
>>>> On  Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:22:54 -0400 there was an Ancient "John
>>>> D.Wentzky"  who
stoppeth one in
>>>> alt.atheism
>
>>>>> The charges must be legitimate for it to make it to court.
>
>>>> They are.
>
>>>>> The charges are false.
>
>>>> That will be decided by a jury. Honestly, after hearing testimony
>>>> from the police and seeing you on the stand, I'd expect a guilty
>>>> verdict in under an hour.
>
>>> ...and in his case, that might include the time of the trial.
>
>>>>> I had to defend myself against an ignorant offended
youngster cop
>>>>> who had no idea how to treat someone who broke no law and who is
>>>>> old enough to have sired him.
>
>>>> So, you admit you resisted arrest?
>
>>> He admitted it,
>
>> I did not say I resisted arrest, because I didn't resist arrest.
>
> Thanks to your chronic inability to understand what you read, you
> resisted arrest - as defined by policy and statute.

I did NOT resist arrest, you idiot. There is nothing written that says I
resisted arrest other than the false charge that Giovanni levied against
me.

>>> even if he didn't realize the meaning of what he
>>> posted.
>
>> The meaning of what I posted was I exercised my legal right to self
>> defense against a junior disrespectful cop named Giovanni who
>> attacked me from behind.
>> I also had to defend myself against cops who began beat me with their
>> batons.
>
> ...which means you were posing more than a normal danger to Giovanni.

No, it doesn't.
What it means is all the people who beat me violated my rights at law.
Giovanni, assaulted me from behind me, you scumbag. Why do you think cops
are supposed to ride around in gangs while their lad asshole criminal
shithead attacks members of the public? Every person who assaulted me is
guilty. I was fully within my rigths at law to defend myself against any
and all persons who attacked me.
Your illegal mafia bullshit is criminal.

>>> The jury deliberations (assuming it gets that far) are likely to be
>>> unusually quick.
>
>> As far as putting cops behind bars, you are correct.
>> It won't be me who stand trial, you criminal.
>
> Your name is the one on the indictment, Perry Mason.

There is no Indictment, idiot.

> You're the
> defendant.

I'm not on trial, idiot.

>> If there is any trial from this incident it will be the criminal cops
>> standing trial who committed crimes against me.
>> Your cirminal allegiance is clear, or is it only your idiocy that is
>> clear to us?
>
> Your insanity is as subtle as a Cat 5 hurricane, Wentzky.

Your insanity does not absolve any cop of any crime they committed.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag