From: Gary Britt 

If there is a particular Enterprise season 4 episode(s) you are missing and
want, let me know and I can put them on a server where you can go and
directly download them.  Each season 4 episode I have is a 350mb AVI file.
At least good TV quality maybe slightly better than that.

Yeah I can see some putting DS9 ahead of Voyager.  I agree Enterprise
should have been better than it was.  I think most of its problems were
budgetary.
  They didn't have a major network putting any dollars into the production
of the series.  That was obvious all along, and they went a bit overboard
with the whole time travel stuff.  Enterprise still has the hottest 1st
Officer in the galaxy though.

Gary

Robert G Lewis wrote:
> Babylon 5 is good, It's one of the few series that I bought the DVD's. Best
> to start at the beginning and go forward. Lots of little things will crop up
> in the later episodes that tie in to stories in the earlier seasons. I'll
> watch almost anything that JMS does. he's a good writer and
is doing some
> DVD release movies based on B5 now.
>
> I liked Enterprise but it did suffer from consistency in the scripts.I hope
> one of the local stations will start reruns again. I missed parts of season
> 4 as there were other shows I preferred and didn't record Enterprise. I
> prefer DS9 then STNG. Voyager had its moments but was weak at times.
> Enterprise should have been far better than it was.
>
> I like BSG but something just doesn't feel right to me with it right now.
> Not sure what though .
>
> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
> news:457f9a36{at}w3.nls.net...
>> I'm a big BSG fan.  Based on Mark's reco, I'll give the room thing a shot
>> on Sunday.  Over the past 3 months I downloaded the entire 4 seasons of
>> Star Trek Enterprise.  Almost done watching the fourth season.  I never
>> got a chance to really watch it when it was on.  I like it.  Certainly
>> better than the SciFi Channel cheesy stuff, but it overall wasn't as good
>> as the other Star Trek series.  Often not properly lit.  Often pretty low
>> budget on sets and special affects (almost amateurish a couple of times),
>> and worst of all suffers from time to time with less than normal Star Trek
>> quality scripts. SNG still probably the best quality of the Star Trek
>> series with Voyager second followed by DS9.  Maybe I need to bit torrent
>> babylon 5.  Never watched more than a few episodes of it.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> Robert G Lewis wrote:
>>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>>> news:457f8663$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>> "Robert G Lewis" 
wrote: Oh No, I agree with Mark
>>>> on something .
>>>>
>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>>> So far I've missed a some bits and pieces, but have
enjoyed it. Glad to
>>>>> hear about Sunday. Right now I'm catching the parts of
tonight's first
>>>>> hour I missed
>>>> The thing is, I'm liking it and I was wanting to recommend
it during the
>>>> first episode, but in the back of my mind is "this is
the SciFi channel,
>>>> maybe I'm imagining that it is actually good?"
>>> originals are pretty cheesy stuff>
>>>>
>>> Of course you do realize they still have an opportunity to
mess it up 
>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed, most of their 'originals' are cheesy, some are entertaining but
>>> still cheesy.  At least BSG, Dr Who and the Stargates are
decent, even if
>>> they are dropping SG1
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5