| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | SDL0705A |
Hello Robert, On Feb 28 19:16 in a msg to Poe Lim, Robert Gorey of 3:632/309 wrote: RG> The 5/7 code results received a "POOR" rating because the RG> transmission level was -8.6dBm and was reported to be 10.4dB too RG> high (loud). RG> The 18/7 code received a "FAIR" rating with a -13.0 dBm RG> transmission level and was reported as being 6.0dB too high RG> (loud). RG> The recent hacked US code also received a "POOR" rating with the RG> highest transmission level of -8.4dBm and was report as being RG> 10.6dB too high. RG> The recommended Telstra transmission level for Faxes is -19dBm as RG> the optimum and lowest level. For analog telephone exchanges a RG> level of between -19 to -16dBm is said to be satisfactory. Lower RG> levels are said to help overcome some echo problems. That's the difference between faxes and data modems; for a modem, you need it as close to -10dB as possible to get through, although the -8.4dB is a tad high, and I've yet to see that. Usually it reports the receive levels, which can be nowhere near -8.4dB. Cheers, Poe --- timEd/2 1.10+* Origin: Serendipity Inc, Cowra +61-63-41 1859 [v34 H16] (3:623/630) SEEN-BY: 50/99 78/0 620/243 623/411 630 631 636 681 683 812 624/300 711/401 SEEN-BY: 711/409 410 413 430 510 808 809 899 932 934 712/515 713/888 714/906 SEEN-BY: 800/1 7877/2809 @PATH: 623/630 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.