From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:szkwt0z2t8q.fsf{at}eris.io.com, The Chief Instigator
 typed:
> Douglas Berry  writes:
>
>> On  Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:22:54 -0400 there was an Ancient "John
>> D.Wentzky"  who stoppeth one in
>> alt.atheism
>
>>> The charges must be legitimate for it to make it to court.
>
>> They are.
>
>>> The charges are false.
>
>> That will be decided by a jury. Honestly, after hearing testimony
>> from the police and seeing you on the stand, I'd expect a guilty
>> verdict in under an hour.
>
> ...and in his case, that might include the time of the trial.
>
>>> I had to defend myself against an ignorant offended youngster cop
>>> who had no idea how to treat someone who broke no law and who is
>>> old enough to have sired him.
>
>> So, you admit you resisted arrest?
>
> He admitted it,

I did not say I resisted arrest, becuase I didn't resist arrest.

> even if he didn't realize the meaning of what he
> posted.

The meaning of what I posted was I exercised my legal right to self defense
against a junior disrespectful cop named Giovanni who attacked me from
behind.
I also had to defend myself against cops who began beat me with their batons.

> The jury deliberations (assuming it gets that far) are likely to be
> unusually quick.

As far as putting cops behind bars, you are correct. It won't be me who
stand trial, you criminal. If there is any trial from this incident it will
be the criminal cops standing trial who committed crimes against me. Your
cirminal allegiance is clear, or is it only your idiocy that is clear to
us?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag