From: "CafeWriter" 


"John D.Wentzky"  wrote in
message news:8mFNh.2892$QG2.1353{at}bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> In news:1174851912.698044.233890{at}y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
> Mark Sebree  typed:
>> On Mar 25, 10:52 am, "John D.Wentzky"

>> wrote:
>>> Innews:1174690060_4897{at}sp6iad.superfeed.net,
>>> J Young  typed:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> What ever became of the Constitutionally protected rights to free
>>>> speech and assembly? What about the rights of all those babies
>>>> needlessly killed inside the abortion mill where this worker earns
>>>> her blood money? What harm
>>>> did these protesters cause?
>>>
>>>>
http://www.journalstar.com/articles/2007/03/22/news/nebraska/doc46015...
>>>
>>>> PAPILLION - A Sarpy County trial has begun for seven abortion
>>>> opponents who gathered outside the Bellevue home of an abortion
>>>> clinic worker last year.
>>>> The seven are Mary Adam, 70, Mary Hansen, 57, Sharon McKee, 51,
>>>> Joseph Reida, 58, Stephen Zach, 64, all of Omaha; and Sam Liberto
>>>> and Joe McDaniel, both 55 and of Bellevue. They face misdemeanor
>>>> charges of unlawful picketing and disturbing the peace.
>>>
>>> Disrespectful pro-choice tax leeches in government,
>>
>> Which do not exist except in your imagination.
>
> They are in the FCC and other agencies.
> They are on local cop sqauds.
> They are tax leeches and threats upon the liberty of the USA.
> They are also in the U.S. military.
> They are in Planned Parenthood.
> You seem to be allied with them, you liar.
> They are also in MADD.
> They are in NOW.
> They are in the NAACP.
>
>>> as evidenced by this
>>> story, are committing the crime of treason against the United States
>>> of America.
>>
>> There was nothing treasonous in anything mentioned in this story.
>> Again, that is your imagination.  Anti-choice activists made
>> themselves a public nuisance and trespassed on a private individual's
>> home.
>
> How did they trespass against any private home if they were on the
> peoples' property?
> The government has no authority to silence speech on the peoples'
> property.
>
>>  And those things ARE against the law.
>
> Censoring the people on public property is treason.
>
>>> They must be disciplined.
>>
>> Pro-choice advocates have done nothing wrong.
>
> You are in error.
>
>> It was the anti-choice advocates that what were trespassing on a private
>> individuals property
>> and harassing her.
>
> I see no proof that anyone other than the property owner herself was on
> her property.
>
>>  And they will be disciplined as the law dictates.
>
> There is no law written that allows prosecution of people who were
> exercising free speech on public property.
>
>>> They do not respect their elders.
>>
>> "Elders" like you do not deserve respect because they do
not respect
>> anyone.
>
> Another statement of treason from Sebree.
>
>> And there is no reason why anyone should respect anti-choice
>> activists and their terroristic attitudes and tactics, as well as
>> their complete disrespect for others.
>
> So, lay down your weapons, criminal.
>
>>> They must be resisted with force.
>>
>> Anti-choice activists are being resisted very effectively, and no
>> force is needed.
>
> Another lie from a criminal coward.
>
>> Their own actions and attitudes are works to bring
>> about their downfall.
>
> So, lay down your stolen weapons and join the pro-life crowd.
>
>> Basically, you are saying that you do not believe in the First
>> Amendment rights of anyone that disagrees with your position.
>
> You are wrong.
>
>>> The penalty for treason is death.
>>>
>>
>> No treason is in evidence.  You do not understand what treason is, nor
>> do you get to define what is and is not treasonous.
>
> I know what treason is.
> You are a treasonous person.
>

*Sigh* Here we go again, a group of people picketing in the front of an
abortion clinic, demanding that women stay away from that awful place and
oh woes, oh woes, think of the "innocent babies dying in that awful
place"!

I think that we have seen enough dramatic acts coming from the
anti-abortionists, especially when they are over the age 50.  Maybe they're
not grandmothers, but really want to be one.

Maybe they want every woman to have children because oh woes, oh woes,
think of these poor babies they're killing, these women are
"murderers"!

But then the meaning of murderer is different between the anti-abortionist
and pro-choicer.

I just have an idea for a new name for the pro-lifers... here it is... anti-choicers.

That's right, that's who pro-lifers really are - they do not want to listen
to women when it comes to their own reproduction choices.  All they think
is the poor, poor fetus inside someone's womb but then when that child is
born, what did the anti-choicers usually do?  They move on, leave that
child behind, and harass someone else.

How's that for an idea for the anti-choicers; a woman would give birth to
an unwanted child, an anti-choicer will then become the child's adoptive
mother or father, and that woman who just gave birth will walk away free. 
How's that for an idea?

No?

Well, it's either that or just letting the woman make her decision.  The
anti-choicers have NO say in what a woman wants to do with HER body.  They
do not control these women.  So they better snap out of it or start
volunteering to be adoptive parents for the unwanted children because not
every "baby" that came out of a woman is a child that someone
wants.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag