| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | SDL0705A |
-=> Quoting Russell Brooks to Robert Gorey <=- RG> I have just used the Telstra Faxstream Testfax Plus number three RG> times using the 5/7/95 SDL, 18/7/95 SDL and the one referred to RG> above. I have received reports back on each of the RG> transmissions. RG> All faxes sent by my OZ Courier (all three SDL's) were RG> transmitted 100% error free at 14400 bits per sec at fine image RG> resolution. Line noise level of -54.9dBm were reported as RG> excellent. RG> I haven't sent many real world faxes with the Courier so am RG> unsure as to what the readings mean in practice. I can say RG> though, that I haven't had any failures in the fax transmissions RG> so far. RG> Anyone want to comment. RB> Yes, NOW WHOSE COMPLAINING. Not me. :-) The data was posted for comment. RB> All the time you were using this FOLDS service (you sent & received RB> faxes) Did you realise that Your Courier was actually doing its job and RB> talking to the Telstra equipment in a manner that actually achieved the RB> desired results. (To send & receive faxes without fault at the highest RB> possible speed with industrial strenght reliabilty) Yes.... and with every other fax I have sent both in OZ and OS including Fax machines and modems. Never a failure. :-) I have however sent less than 100 faxes in total to maybe 8 or 10 destinations so my sampling isn't that large. RB> In the end isn't that what you bought you Courier for, in the first RB> place Right. :-) RB> Thanks for those test results, but I think that I would take word of RB> an engineer at USR as gospel before I took the word of an engineer at RB> Telstra ( Who is only in the job because he's not good enough to get a RB> real job in the outside world) Better read my post again. Never did I say I accept the word of Telstra. I am interested however in comments on whether Telstra's statement about desirable levels has *any* validity and further whether other people are experiencing similar results to me. Cheers Rob ---* Origin: Melbourne PC User Group +61-3-9699-6788 (3:632/309) SEEN-BY: 50/99 78/0 620/243 621/525 623/630 624/300 632/0 107 304 309 315 318 SEEN-BY: 632/325 326 329 348 359 366 367 371 393 454 501 506 514 516 525 530 SEEN-BY: 632/552 998 999 1000 633/371 634/384 388 635/301 402 502 503 541 544 SEEN-BY: 637/103 639/252 670/301 711/401 409 410 413 430 510 808 809 899 932 SEEN-BY: 711/934 712/515 713/888 714/906 800/1 7877/2809 @PATH: 632/309 998 635/503 50/99 711/808 809 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.