From: "thomas p." 

On 19 Mar., 17:44, "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote:
> Innews:CVyLh.7487$JZ3.622{at}newssvr13.news.prodigy.net,
> Dennis Kemmerer  typed:
>
>
>
>
>
> >  wrote in message
> >news:1174278927.733609.207620{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Mar 18, 8:25 pm, "RamRod Sword of Baal"

> >> wrote:
> >>> "Sound of Trumpet"
 wrote in
> >>>
messagenews:1174263570.489478.168630{at}n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...http:
//www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1799776/posts
>
> >>>> Permitting legal unions apart from marriage injures
young people by
> >>>> "placing them in a situation that does not give
security, that does
> >>>> not give stability or serenity."
>
> >>> Here in Australia de facto relationships are protected by law.
>
> >>> There is no reason why this cannot be done in other countries, if
> >>> it has not
> >>> already been done.
>
> >> For the simple reason that the people do not want it.
>
> > I suspected you were a dimwitted wanker when I responded to your last
> > post, and you've confirmed it.
>
> > In the 1960s, 'people' didn't want inter-racial marriages either.
>
> It had to be pro-choice bigots such as you that didn't want them.
> Why aren't people married now, pro-choice idiot bigot?
>
> > And in the early 1900s, they didn't want inter-faith marriages.
>
> Why are you complaining about that?
> Are you against people having the way they like it?-


No, you are.  You are against same-sex marriage, right?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag