Reply-to: Steve.Sebastian@ibm.net
From: "Steve Sebastian" 
Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,alt.paranormal.channeling
Organization: Investment Enterprise S.A.
Original Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:19:07 +0000
In Article  on Tue, 15 Apr 1997 
13:38:01 -0700 AliKat  wrote:
<< i meant, in the show they talk about how a piece of string, when 
straightened out, doesn't touch itself, as is with linear 
time...however, what if time is like a piece of string that is all 
balled up and touching in different places, intertwining and crossing 
all over the place? >>
hmmmm...I never thought about it. I personally don't like time travel. 
A friend of mine travels through time, he has only told me this once, 
but he claims to keep telling me after he goes. He told me next time he 
goes he will take me along, but he never came back though, but I 
wouldn't go anyways. Now did he come back, and is trying to take 
another me, in another line of time? If I exist in multiple points in 
time, do I not exist in infinite temporal dimensions (time lines). Also 
in these other temporal dimensions am I telling you the same thing? How 
can I become a whole person again. What if I am not a whole person, 
what if i'm fragmented. What if my brain is like a television receiver 
tuned to different stations (each station being a point in time or a 
different aspect of space). Maybe he's talking to the same me set on a 
different station. Maybe the expansion of consciousness is nothing but 
an integration of these stations (alternate realitys). Maybe 
hallucinations are just glimpses of co-existing realities. Well I am 
dismounting this train of thought, because I really don't like the 
destination. Hope this helped.
Steve Sebastian
PS - A thought just came to me, someone should be able to sue Earl for 
invasion of privacy by now. He readily admits he can remote view 
(whether or not he can, is another story). So now if someone can make 
him admit he remote viewed them without there permission it would make 
for a wonderful civil suit. Just go into court wearing an aluminum foil 
suit, act all paranoid, have the receipts for lining your apartment and 
car with lead, I am sure the punitive damages would be substantial in 
this clearly precedent setting case. Reading through Earl's posts the 
Judge will (besides laughing) see his clearly influential (detrimental 
in nature) type behavior. His fraudulent claims, his threats of psychic 
harm (of course it would make the plaintiff seem paranoid in nature) 
but it would be enough to prove psychological trauma for a substantial 
punitive award. Granted not the original charge, but it does prove how 
Earl has shattered the life of millions. So like what do you think?
--- MailGate 0.25e
---------------