Path:
eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!b
order1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!bcyclone04.am1.xlned.com!bcyclo
ne04.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost1.xs4all.n
et!not-for-mail
From: "R.Wieser" 
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support
References: 



Subject: Re: Explorer filename sorting problem - NoStrCmpLogical already
present
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 20:05:22 +0200
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Lines: 91
Message-ID: 
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.163.119.5
X-Trace: 1459101927 news.xs4all.nl 5910 83.163.119.5:3707
X-Complaints-To: abuse{at}xs4all.nl
X-Received-Bytes: 3596
X-Received-Body-CRC: 4040803474
Xref: mx02.eternal-september.org
microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support:31825

JJ,

> See the cached page from Google using below Google search query:
>
> cache:https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/319827

Thanks, I can see the page now.  Alas, it only describes the usage of
NoStrCmpLogical, which I have already applied.

Disabeling the setting and re-enabeling it (on both HKCU and HKLM brances)
does not seem to change anything on that folder.

And a funny thing is that it seems to do the same on the second column as it
does (as shown) on the third column.  Almost as if it starts to sort on
extension first, only than on the filename.  But that shows not to be the
case, as the first column is sorted in order (have more than just those 60.*
files).   Rather odd.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


-- Origional message:
JJ  schreef in berichtnieuws
114gd4iaipkfp.ba50up4m8pmp.dlg{at}40tude.net...
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:35:50 +0200, R.Wieser wrote:
> > JJ,
> >
> >> NoStrCmpLogical is a policy setting for (Windows) Explorer only.
> >
> > Than is doubly remarkable that *both* show the same list ....
> >
> >> CMD is never affected and will always use binary compare for sorting.
> >
> > Please, don't do that.  You can see for yourself that it doesn't appear
to
> > do so.  :-(
> >
> >> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/319827>
> >
> > That page seems to have become outdated, as I was met with the
(in)famous
> > "Try searching for what you need. This page doesn't exist." error
message.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rudy Wieser
> >
> > -- Origional message:
> > JJ  schreef in berichtnieuws
> > 1f6vwnr37eok9.1jaqewr69jsjg$.dlg{at}40tude.net...
> >> On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 19:58:23 +0100, R.Wieser wrote:
> >>> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>> My file explorer seems to have trouble sorting filenames in an
intuitive
> >>> way.  Just look at the below (listing generated using
"dir /one 60.*",
> > but
> >>> the same order appears in Explorer)
> >>>
> >>> 60.00.00.32.dds
> >>> 60.00.00.32.msh
> >>> 60.00.00.32.nif
> >>> 60.00.32.32.dds
> >>> 60.00.-32.32.dds
> >>> 60.00.32.32.msh
> >>> 60.00.-32.32.msh
> >>> 60.00.32.32.nif
> >>> 60.00.-32.32.nif
> >>>
> >>> I would expect the "60.00.-30.*" entries to
come first, followed by
the
> >>> "60.00.00.*" and "60.00.32.*" groups.
> >>>
> >>> Some time ago (years probably :-) ) I've added the NoStrCmpLogical
> > setting,
> >>> and thought that it was fixed.  But apperantly no such luck.
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone know what is going on here -- or better yet,
how to fix it
?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Rudy Wieser
>
> See the cached page from Google using below Google search query:
>
> cache:https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/319827
>
> Or use web archive.

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1