From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:1174332745.812707.30260{at}e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com, thomas p.
 typed:
> On 19 Mar., 17:44, "John D.Wentzky"

> wrote:
>> Innews:CVyLh.7487$JZ3.622{at}newssvr13.news.prodigy.net,
>> Dennis Kemmerer  typed:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>  wrote in message
>>> news:1174278927.733609.207620{at}l75g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>>> On Mar 18, 8:25 pm, "RamRod Sword of Baal"

>>>> wrote:
>>>>> "Sound of Trumpet"
 wrote in
>>>>>
messagenews:1174263570.489478.168630{at}n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...http:
//www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1799776/posts
>>
>>>>>> Permitting legal unions apart from marriage
injures young people
>>>>>> by "placing them in a situation that does not
give security,
>>>>>> that does not give stability or serenity."
>>
>>>>> Here in Australia de facto relationships are protected by law.
>>
>>>>> There is no reason why this cannot be done in other
countries, if
>>>>> it has not
>>>>> already been done.
>>
>>>> For the simple reason that the people do not want it.
>>
>>> I suspected you were a dimwitted wanker when I responded to your
>>> last post, and you've confirmed it.
>>
>>> In the 1960s, 'people' didn't want inter-racial marriages either.
>>
>> It had to be pro-choice bigots such as you that didn't want them.
>> Why aren't people married now, pro-choice idiot bigot?
>>
>>> And in the early 1900s, they didn't want inter-faith marriages.
>>
>> Why are you complaining about that?
>> Are you against people having the way they like it?-
>
>
> No, you are.

I'm not complaining about it.

>  You are against same-sex marriage, right?

Yes.
Is it a sin to be against same-sex marriages? LOL!

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag