| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Physical fitness and |
"Peter Webb" wrote in
news:cbc9qd$270d$1{at}darwin.ediacara.org:
>> Calories were not readily available to most of our ancestors - they
>> took care to conserve the ones they had, and avoided wasting them on
>> unused functions.
> Yes, but I don't see that the adaptations that occur in response to
> cardio training involve any additional energy consumption. (Though the
> training itself obviously does). Its not tissue mass - cardio training
> doesn't increase your body weight (usually the opposite). Nor have I
> have ever heard a theory that fit people need more food than unfit
> people at the same level of activity.
> So what is the evolutionary advantage of reversing the adaptations to
> exercise, which compensates for the huge disadvantage that unfit
> people have when confronted by hungry tigers? What is the hidden (to
> me) cost of being fit?
First of all you should be aware that not every aspect of our physiology
is an adaption that is the result of selection - some are due to drift,
especially if there was no real selective pressure on the trait for our
ancestors. For most of human history, if you didn't get exercise you
didn't eat, so the loss of cardio fitness in the absence of exercise
would never be selected against. Meanwhile, the general loss of unused
muscle mass was (as you have noted previously) selected for, so the same
mechanism that caused that would also cause the loss of cardio fitness
unless our ancestors routinely were exposed to conditions in which they
were inactive but well fed - and I would guess those conditions were
rare.
Our current problem is that we have two different trends going on that
were both originally adaptive. One is the tendency to put on additional
weight when starvation is not occurring. For most of human evolution,
humans underwent periods of starvation on a regular basis. So it was
advantageous, during periods of excess food, to add fat.The second is the
tendency to lose muscle and fitness in response to inactivity, which we
have discussed above. Now people can get lots of calories without
expending any energy, and the result is readily apparent.
Yours,
Bill Morse
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com
---
* RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
* RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 6/26/04 10:13:04 PM
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.