-= Pete Replied to Bill Grimsley about: USRMaestro connects =-

G'day Bill

 BG> Not only do NetComm support asymmetrical link rates with V.34,

 PC> That's good to hear, Wonder if it's always been there and i just
 PC> haven't seen it or it's been added in the later 2.61L flash
 PC> code.

 BG> Poe has suggested that is was added to later M34F flash-ROMs.

I had that suspicion myself, now all Netcomm has to do is have some
sort of after call dump, "something better than the current ATI10" to
give the user some connect stats. BTW called a mates M34F "with the
2.61L code" the other day with my USR (inhanced code) and got a
28000/28000 rock solid connect straight off, things must be improving.

 BG> of say 21600/24000, yet the final stats sometimes indicate that
 BG> the modems have shifted up (without retraining) to 28800/28800.
 BG> The USR is certainly far superior on marginal lines though.

I'll agree with you on that one.

 PC> away, BTW You must be about the only one getting good connects
 PC> to Pauls board.

 BG> You'd be joking!  While the Courier was on-line at Paul's, I had
 BG> nothing but perfect 28800 connects, but both the Viper and
 BG> NetComm fail to connect at all around 80% of the time, unless I
 BG> force a lower speed.  The USR's line probe stats show excessive
 BG> loss at higher frequencies, so both our lines (exchange to
 BG> subscriber) could be considerably better IMO.

AYS could be the combined effect of bad lines at both ends, BTW i did
a quick call to Paul's TML BBS the other day using my M11F and got a
28800/LAP-M/V42bis connect straight off, just requested his file list
so i wasn't on for long but the connect seemed fine.

   -=Pete=-


--- OMX/Blue Wave v2.12