Hello Ian,

On Mar 05 03:24 in a msg to Poe Lim, Ian Smith of 3:626/660 wrote:

 IS> Right, ta.  Well, that strengthens the case for V34 and V32b being
 IS> redundent modem flags for nodelisting, which is what this was in
 IS> reference too - in other words V.34 requires V.8, which apparently
 IS> specifies that V.32bis be available as well in modems using it ..
 IS> I'd like to check this myself.

There was some debate on that some time back, as apparently v.32bis is not
necessary, but recommended.

 IS> requiring V.32bis also (fairly obvious).  It's unlear whether V.fc
 IS> does also, despite the Rockwell and USR modems implementing it all
 IS> doing V.32bis also (anyway). 

I don't think Rockwell knows...



Cheers,
Poe

--- timEd/2 1.10+