On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:12:40 -0500, FromTheRafters
 wrote:

>~BD~ formulated on Monday :
>> On 15/12/2014 11:13, p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:57:14 -0500, FromTheRafters
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote :
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:36:58 -0500, FromTheRafters
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't care why you posted the scoring info, and even less about how
>>>>>> Jax *still* thinks something was wrong with exevalid after all of the
>>>>>> explanations we have provided. Jax and Crybaby don't seem to be at all
>>>>>> concerned about providing truthful posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> That really is funny. Exevalid had a major mathematical flaw in the
>>>>> 'coding'. It's a heap of ####. No amount of 'explanations' will ever
>>>>> change that.
>>>>
>>>> I stand corrected. Jax, Crybaby, and Pooh.
>>>
>>> Pooh doesn't need to lie.
>>
>> It appears that Rafters has a sense of humour failure this morning. :-(
>>
>> Perhaps he got out of the wrong side of the bed; for him, it is VERY early
to 
>> be posting! He'll be "good to go" after another mug of coffee!
>
>Still no coffee, but my comment was about the fact that exevalid had no 
>flaw in the way it performed on the set of data for which it was 
>designed. The comment by Ant was not to be taken as "I appreciate (am 
>glad about) the fact that you didn't attempt to use it on modern PE 
>executables" it was more of an "I appreciate (understand) that it 
>wasn't designed for modern executables". Not a negative comment at all, 
>as some people like to make it seem.
>
>I have no idea at this point whether Dustin misunderstood the 
>capabilities of the program when working on modern PEs (the header 
>filesize information being bogus) or not, and I don't care, it still 
>stands that the program was not flawed. It does indeed *appear* to be 
>incongruous to take the absolute value of a natural number, but in this 
>case it was correct.

Twaddle. You don't code that kind of flaw in as a correct solution.
Doing it correctly was trivial. Dustin just didn't know what he was
doing and he didn't check or if he did check he checked wrong which is
even more damning. Sorry you got your arse kicked. I gave you every
chance to win. Even that wasn't enough to help you sad arrogant
bastards.

>My humor is fine, you just have to be sharp enough to 'get' it.
>

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, 
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, 
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, 
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, 
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2