On 13 Aug 96 09:51pm, Bill Cheek wrote to Joe Nicholson:
BC>>> NOTICE OF PENDING RULEMAKING: DISCUSSION AND COMMENTS ARE SOLICITED
...
BC>>> We do have a rule limiting signature lines and the PGP thing
BC>>> certainly appears to violate it.
JN>> Another reason they should be banned. Make one exception and you
JN>> open a whole can of worms.
BC> Except that digital sigs are coming into vogue everywhere else.
They may be in vogue, but do they have anything to do with scanning?
It seems to me that if the post isn't coded, a decoding key is simply not
needed. As such, it becomes part of a signature line, and should be limited
as any other sig line.
As I see it.
Bill Funk: Internet: skypilot@starlink.com
ASCIi User Group: http://www.starlink.com:80/~ascii
... -A mainframe: The biggest PC peripheral available.
--- Via Silver Xpress V4.00 SW12853
---------------
* Origin: Inn on The Park - RIME/FIDO/Intelec/UUCP (1:114/237)
|