After serious thinking p-0''0-h the cat (ES) wrote :
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:36:58 -0500, FromTheRafters
>  wrote:
>
>> I don't care why you posted the scoring info, and even less about how 
>> Jax *still* thinks something was wrong with exevalid after all of the 
>> explanations we have provided. Jax and Crybaby don't seem to be at all 
>> concerned about providing truthful posts.
>
> That really is funny. Exevalid had a major mathematical flaw in the
> 'coding'. It's a heap of ####. No amount of 'explanations' will ever
> change that.

I stand corrected. Jax, Crybaby, and Pooh.


--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2