From: No One 

"John D.Wentzky"  writes:

> In news:87vegwptxh.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net,
> No One  typed:
> > "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
> >
> >> In news:87lkhs6ctj.fsf{at}nospam.pacbell.net,
> >> No One  typed:
> >>> "John D.Wentzky"
 writes:
> >
> >>>>>>> "H Dickmann"
 writes:
> >
> >>>>>>>> I did some plumbing on the weekend,
> >>>>>>>> Can you tell me why i could not join
two male fittings?
> >         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Because you weren't hot enough. :-)
> >>>>>>> (Enough heat, and you could have just
welded them together.)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, are you faggots going to light your dicks
on fire to put them
> >       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>>>>> together?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Oh, so you are one of those mindless
"Christians" who call anyone
> >>>>> who disagrees with you a "faggot".
> >>>>
> >>>> Me, mindless?
> >>>> Does that mean your apparent resistance to "Say
No to Same-Sex
> >>>> Marriage" via a reference to welding two male
members together
> >>>> wouldn't make anyone think you are gay?
> >>>
> >>> Anyone with a shred of intelligence wouldn't consider such a
> >>> wisecrack (it was about welding metal pipes together, not
"male
> >>> members")
> >>
> >> it said 'male fittings', alzheimers case.
> >
> > Wentzky, you are a pathetic, ignorant, and arrogant fool (I've
> > underlined the key phrases for you, to give you a tiny chance to
> > figure out how badly you made a fool of yourself).  In case you don't
> > know, the terms "male" fittings and "female"
fittings is used to
> > describe plumbing - the "male" ones screw or slide into
the "female"
> > ones.  The same terminology is used for electrical connectors as well.
>
> While you ignore penis and vagina.
> LOL!

An attempt to cover up your stupidity?  The guy I replied to wasn't talking
about a "penis and vagina".  He was talking about fixing his
plumbing.

> >> all because of pro-choice lazy fools and gay fools.
> >
> > You mean the ones smart enough to reevaluate their opinions are
> > "fools" because they don't agree with a fool like you?
>
> You mean those who are only playing the nation for benefits.

What are you babbling about now?  The people who are no longer opposed to
same-sex marriages but who were formerly opposed most likely would not
benefit from any change.

> >>> (it was higher a few years ago).  I'll give you a hint: 50%
> >>> of California's population is not gay.  Basically, you shouldn't
> >>> jump to conclusions one way or the other.
> >>
> >> gay does not include lesbians.
> >
> > Gays + lesbians make up way less than 50% of the population.
>
> Factoid time is now completed.

I.e., you spouted off and were proved to be wrong as usual.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag