From: "Mark" 

Honestly Randy, I don't think there's any need for a source. I'd be
flabbergasted if we didn't have continually updated contingency plans for
that potential eventuality as well as for North Korea (and others).

"Randy H"  wrote in message
news:414a2902$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Source?
>
> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> news:414a2571$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Yes, and they've had them for a long time, and if they became unstable
>> and
>> were about to go the mullah route, we already have plans in place to
>> secure
>> there nuclear facilities.  As we should.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
>> news:414a19c5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> > Any president who lets a terrorist radical Islamic regime
go nuclear
>>> > should
>>> > be SHOT.
>>>
>>> You do know Pakistan is considered an Islamic state, don't you? I don't
>>> think you'd shoot Bush for it...
>>>
>>> - Bob Comer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>>> news:414a17f7$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> > Why would I care.  What I care about most is no radical
Islamic State
>>> > should
>>> > ever be allowed to have nuclear weapons even if it means we have to
>>> > use
>>> > MOABs or low yield Tactical Nukes.
>>> >
>>> > Any president who lets a terrorist radical Islamic regime
go nuclear
>>> > should
>>> > be SHOT.
>>> >
>>> > Gary
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > "Robert G Lewis" 
wrote in message
>>> > news:414a0ddb$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> >> What makes you think that Iranians wouldn't support
and defend their
>>> > country
>>> >> ? Especially after seeing the occupation of Iraq and
Afghanistan.
>>> >>
>>> >> Bob Lewis
>>> >>
>>> >> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
>>> >> news:4149b592$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> >> > No it would be we fire, they bitch, rattle
sabers, and then get
>>> > overthrown
>>> >> > by the moderates even faster.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Gary
>>> >> >
>>> >> > "Adam Flinton"
 wrote in message
>>> >> > news:41496f53$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> >> >> Gary Britt wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > Do you think the US should have any
other position OTHER THAN we
>>> > won't
>>> >> > let
>>> >> >> > Iran go nuclear?
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> A position is one thing. War is another.
& be in no doubt that a
>>> >> >> strike
>>> >> >> would only be the opening salvo of a large
scale war (possibly
>>> >> >> from
>>> >> >> the
>>> >> >> Med to Pakistan) & not some "fire
& forget" strike as some in the
>>> >> >> US
>>> >> >> might imagine.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Adam
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > Gary
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > "Rich Gauszka"
 wrote in message
>>> >> >> > news:4148fb7e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>It looks like Israel is whispering
in Bush's ear again
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>http://news.ft.com/cms/s/eed88be8-0741-11d9-9672-00000e2511c8.html
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>The Bush administration's warnings
that it will not "tolerate" a
>>> >> >> >>nuclear-armed Iran have opened up a
lively policy debate in
>>> > Washington
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > over
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>the merits of military strikes
against the Islamic republic's
>>> >> >> >>nuclear
>>> >> >> >>programme.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>Analysts close to the administration
say military options are
>> under
>>> >> >> >>consideration, but have not reached
a level of seriousness that
>>> >> >> >>indicate
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > the
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>US is preparing actual action.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5