From: "Gary Britt" 

Don't have a link but it was reported in main stream media quite a while
back about the period of time when there was concern if Musharaff would
survive or be overthrown by Islamic terrorists what would happen with
Pakistani nukes, and it was written that there were already plans in place
to secure the Pakistani nuke sites so that the nukes would never fall into
the hands of the Islamic fundamentalists.

Gary


"Randy H"  wrote in message
news:414a2902$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> Source?
>
> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> news:414a2571$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > Yes, and they've had them for a long time, and if they became unstable
and
> > were about to go the mullah route, we already have plans in place to
> > secure
> > there nuclear facilities.  As we should.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> > news:414a19c5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> > Any president who lets a terrorist radical Islamic
regime go nuclear
> >> > should
> >> > be SHOT.
> >>
> >> You do know Pakistan is considered an Islamic state, don't you? I don't
> >> think you'd shoot Bush for it...
> >>
> >> - Bob Comer
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
> >> news:414a17f7$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> > Why would I care.  What I care about most is no radical
Islamic State
> >> > should
> >> > ever be allowed to have nuclear weapons even if it means
we have to
use
> >> > MOABs or low yield Tactical Nukes.
> >> >
> >> > Any president who lets a terrorist radical Islamic
regime go nuclear
> >> > should
> >> > be SHOT.
> >> >
> >> > Gary
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Robert G Lewis" 
wrote in message
> >> > news:414a0ddb$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> What makes you think that Iranians wouldn't support
and defend their
> >> > country
> >> >> ? Especially after seeing the occupation of Iraq and
Afghanistan.
> >> >>
> >> >> Bob Lewis
> >> >>
> >> >> "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
> >> >> news:4149b592$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> > No it would be we fire, they bitch, rattle
sabers, and then get
> >> > overthrown
> >> >> > by the moderates even faster.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Gary
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Adam Flinton"
 wrote in message
> >> >> > news:41496f53$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> >> Gary Britt wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Do you think the US should have any
other position OTHER THAN
we
> >> > won't
> >> >> > let
> >> >> >> > Iran go nuclear?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> A position is one thing. War is another.
& be in no doubt that a
> >> >> >> strike
> >> >> >> would only be the opening salvo of a large
scale war (possibly
from
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> Med to Pakistan) & not some "fire
& forget" strike as some in the
> >> >> >> US
> >> >> >> might imagine.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Adam
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Gary
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > "Rich Gauszka"
 wrote in message
> >> >> >> > news:4148fb7e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>It looks like Israel is whispering
in Bush's ear again
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
>>http://news.ft.com/cms/s/eed88be8-0741-11d9-9672-00000e2511c8.html
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>The Bush administration's warnings
that it will not "tolerate"
a
> >> >> >> >>nuclear-armed Iran have opened up a
lively policy debate in
> >> > Washington
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > over
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>the merits of military strikes
against the Islamic republic's
> >> >> >> >>nuclear
> >> >> >> >>programme.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>Analysts close to the
administration say military options are
> > under
> >> >> >> >>consideration, but have not reached
a level of seriousness that
> >> >> >> >>indicate
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>US is preparing actual action.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5