WN> In short, v.34+ has nothing to do with good code for the v.34
 WN> implementation. The v.34 code prior to the July 
 WN> flash was just not up to
 WN> it. The "other" enhancements were Srej, and them fixing the code.:-)
 FD> This doesn't agree with what I've read else where.  
 FD> Where does your definition come from.
From me. When I upgraded the Sportster to 4/18/95 rom, I got the same 
increase in connect speed that I did with the 5/95 beta codes for the 
Courier. The Sportster now connects just as good as the Courier and the 
Sportster doesn't have v.34+. V.34 is v.34, period. If you call with a v.34+ 
modem to a v.34 modem, you connect with v.34, thus it's the CODE that was 
fixed. V.34+ is a nice addition. I'm sure they couldn't have got it working 
without fixing the v.34 routines though.:-)
I'm sure that if you could talk to the programmers, and get a truthful 
answer, they'd tell you the same thing.
--- Maximus/2 3.00
---------------