From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:UaELh.11602$PL.10205{at}newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net, Andrealphus
 typed:
> In News CnCLh.25144$68.20395{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>
>> In news:1174332896.135701.85470{at}y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
>> thomas p.  typed:
>>> On 19 Mar., 20:09, "Patriot Games"
 wrote:
>>>> "John"  wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:1174322257.074547.319270{at}b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>> How does Gay Marriage weaken family stability?
>>>>
>>>> Who cares?  Its irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>> Marriage is for a man and a woman.
>>>
>>> Not if the law is changed, and, in some places, it has changed.
>>
>> By the constitutionally required process?
>
> In Massachusetts, it was the constitutionally required process.

Opinion is what you are siding with, not with Constitutional law.

> You see, all laws have to be in compliance with the State Constitution.

And, the existing marriage laws before the mssc corrupted them were so. The
marriage laws before the mssc courrupted them were enacted by the
Constitutional process.
The mssc is out of order.

> If a passed law fails to meet constitutional muster, it can be
> overturned, PER MASSACHUSETTS STATE CONSTITUTION.

The mssc did not overturn ma marriage laws when they were passed into law.

> I know that will escape the few living cells of gray matter you might
> have, but that's the way it is.

What escapes your brain is the way constitutional government is supposed to operate.
We can blame all the harm on the wicked judges of this roevwadedom era.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag