From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:Z1ILh.14950$Jl.10903{at}newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net, Andrealphus
 typed:
> In News B_HLh.25219$68.24185{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>
>> In news:b5HLh.129337$_73.123362{at}newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net,
>> Andrealphus  typed:
>>> In News gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>>> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>
>>>> In news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
>>>> Free Lunch  typed:
>>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:21:41 -0400, in alt.atheism
>>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in
>>>>> :
>>>>>> In news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>>>>> Dionisio  typed:
>>>>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thomas p.  typed:
>>>>>>>>> Not if the law is changed, and, in
some places, it has
>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By the constitutionally required process?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Judicial review *is* a Constitutional thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of cases brought to court, not of laws that were
constitutionally
>>>>>> enacted. The judical branch is not the the
"E" in E Pluribus
>>>>>> Unum.
>>>>>>> Oops.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your idiocy is easily dismissed as high treason.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You clearly are ignorant of our Constitution. Please
do not vote.
>>>>
>>>> You'd rather me be a candidate?
>>>
>>> Sure, it would give the assassins a real target for a change.
>>
>> I bet they couldn't shoot me on the Space Shuttle.
>
> Do you plan on spending a lot of time there?

WIll they have a BOWFLEX with enough weight on it? With more than one
shuttle I could order a pizza from dominoes. Gotta have a television, too,
you know? I bet reception is really clear from there, don't you?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag