From: Attila 

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:59:24 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
 in alt.abortion with message-id
 wrote:

>In news:tvvtv21jh9dvsijlu455hna339diblbqpm{at}4ax.com,
>Attila  typed:
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:27:16 -0400, "John D.Wentzky"
>>  in alt.abortion with message-id
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> In news:1174332896.135701.85470{at}y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
>>> thomas p.  typed:
>>>> On 19 Mar., 20:09, "Patriot Games"
 wrote:
>>>>> "John"  wrote
in message
>>>>>
>>>>> news:1174322257.074547.319270{at}b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>> How does Gay Marriage weaken family stability?
>>>>>
>>>>> Who cares?  Its irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>> Marriage is for a man and a woman.
>>>>
>>>> Not if the law is changed, and, in some places, it has changed.
>>>
>>> By the constitutionally required process?
>>> NO!
>>>
>>
>> Exactly where does the Constitution address marriage laws?  Please be
>> specific, with quotes.
>
>Where it says that the powers the states already reserved to themselves can
>not be usurped by the federal government.
>

Hardly an answer.  But about what I expected from you.

And that is not what is said.

"Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or
to the people."

http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html


Nothing is said about any new powers not being allowed to be added to the
Constitution, for example.

What is this 'Constitutionally required process' you say was not followed? 
Please be specific.

--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag