From: "Andrealphus" 

In News B_HLh.25219$68.24185{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:

> In news:b5HLh.129337$_73.123362{at}newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net,
> Andrealphus  typed:
>> In News gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>> at johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>
>>> In news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
>>> Free Lunch  typed:
>>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:21:41 -0400, in alt.atheism
>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in
>>>> :
>>>>> In news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>>>> Dionisio  typed:
>>>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thomas p.  typed:
>>>>>>>> Not if the law is changed, and, in some
places, it has changed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By the constitutionally required process?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Judicial review *is* a Constitutional thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of cases brought to court, not of laws that were
constitutionally
>>>>> enacted. The judical branch is not the the
"E" in E Pluribus Unum.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oops.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your idiocy is easily dismissed as high treason.
>>>>>
>>>> You clearly are ignorant of our Constitution. Please do not vote.
>>>
>>> You'd rather me be a candidate?
>>
>> Sure, it would give the assassins a real target for a change.
>
> I bet they couldn't shoot me on the Space Shuttle.

Do you plan on spending a lot of time there?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag