> There are researchers who are at best only occasionally
> right
> about SOME things.
 
And who's to say which ones those are?
> 
> 
> Speak for yourself.  In any event, there is no way to
>
Excuse me..are YOU a practioner, a dr, a researcher?  I don't know of anyone 
who is...if so they have not made themselves known as such.  What we post 
here are reports that by some means come to our attention.  That is ALL..if 
anything we are reporters.  WE can say if something that we happened to have 
used was either good or bad for US but that doesn't mean that it would have 
the same result for anyone else.
 
 
You seem intend on taking what I said OUT of context.  THe point is, endless 
debating gets no one anywhere.  If someone has a mind set on one opinion, 
they aren't likely to change it.  Information presented will interest them or 
not, bantering back and forth is time consuming, tedious, boring and 
irritating.  Information is presented, either accept it, try it or leave it.  
This echo has gotten into the "I'm right and if you don't agree with me 
you're an idiot" frame which brings out name calling etc.  There is a vast 
difference between this is what I read,saw, experienced, think etc and 
debating.  THis is NOT a debate echo.  Those who wish to do so should find 
another echo to play one upmanship on. 
--- D'Bridge 1.30/002111
---------------