From: "thomas p." 

On 20 Mar., 01:21, "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote:
> Innews:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
> Dionisio  typed:
>
> > John D.Wentzky wrote:
>
> >> thomas p.  typed:
> >>> Not if the law is changed, and, in some places, it has changed.
>
> >> By the constitutionally required process?
>
> > Judicial review *is* a Constitutional thing.
>
> Of cases brought to court, not of laws that were constitutionally enacted.
> The judical branch is not the the "E" in E Pluribus Unum.

The cases brought to court concern laws.  Judicial review has been an
established part of the process in the US for more than 200 years.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag