From: "Glenn Meadows" 

Several observers this AM offered this "idea", not sure, but it
could hold water...

Bush's facial expression could be him holding his tongue where he wanted to
say "YOU IDIOT", or "We're already DOING that..." (as
in try to get a broader coalition going), but his "handlers" had
told him to not get into a direct attack.

I do want to hear about this "Global Test" thing....does that
mean that we have to pass a test administered by "The World"
before we can defend ourselves?  I think NOT...

No way, no how should we ever allow others to "vote" on what's
best for our interests.

Also heard some more detailed analysis of the "flash polls",
where the people who felt that Kerry won, said that they were going to vote
for Bush though....

--
Glenn M.


"Mark"  wrote in message
news:415cd1a8$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> I call em like I see em. TIE.
>
> Bush missed a lot of opportunities to mess up Kerry's hair, but didn't
take
> them effectively. OTOH, Kerry threw in a kitchen sink of crap at the end,
> even adding in an inane reference to stem cell research.
>
> You're right though, tomorrow's call of a "wonderful"
appearance by Kerry
in
> the press, will mean that Kerry adds a couple points in the upcoming polls
> on Monday. Not enough points though.
>
>
> "John Cuccia"  wrote in message
> news:8ojpl0d906reucflta3hgifa6oogr5gfkr{at}4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:24:31 -0400, "Mark"
 wrote:
> >
> >>Bottom-Line: TIE.
> >
> > I don't think it was a tie, I think Kerry got quite the better of it,
> > but that probably doesn't surprise you .   What surprises me is
> > that, as much as you favor Bush and the Repulican spin, the best you
> > can do is call it a tie.
> >
> > Early polls are alleged to have Kerry "winning", though
I haven't seen
> > anything published.   The results will be interesting.
> >
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5