From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:b5HLh.129337$_73.123362{at}newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net,
Andrealphus  typed:
> In News gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky at
> johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>
>> In news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
>> Free Lunch  typed:
>>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:21:41 -0400, in alt.atheism
>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in
>>> :
>>>> In news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>>> Dionisio  typed:
>>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> thomas p.  typed:
>>>>>>> Not if the law is changed, and, in some
places, it has changed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By the constitutionally required process?
>>>>>
>>>>> Judicial review *is* a Constitutional thing.
>>>>
>>>> Of cases brought to court, not of laws that were constitutionally
>>>> enacted. The judical branch is not the the "E"
in E Pluribus Unum.
>>>>
>>>>> Oops.
>>>>
>>>> Your idiocy is easily dismissed as high treason.
>>>>
>>> You clearly are ignorant of our Constitution. Please do not vote.
>>
>> You'd rather me be a candidate?
>
> Sure, it would give the assassins a real target for a change.

I bet they couldn't shoot me on the Space Shuttle.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag