From: jeff 

Rich Gauszka wrote:
> "jeff"  wrote in message
> news:41588d18$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
>>Rich Gauszka wrote:
>>
>>>Somehow the post got corrupted
>>
>>>http://www.cwfa.org/articledisplay.asp?id=6405&department=CFI&categoryid=fam
ily
>>>
>>>Under changes proposed by the Pentagon, frequenting a prostitute could
>>>soon be a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). As
>>>soon as early next year, military members who pay for sexual services
>>>could face a dishonorable discharge and up to a year in jail.
>>>
>>>
>>>The change is part of an ongoing effort by the Defense Department to
>>>combat human trafficking. If approved, the changes would apply to
>>>military members even in countries where prostitution is legal.
>>>
>>
>>Well, you've got to admit that the ideals in the last paragraph are good.
>>
>>I would be willing to bet that a secondary, although probably mostly
>>unmentioned goal, is to cut down on STD's, especially HIV.
>>
>
>
> When I was stationed on Okinawa and the 173rd Airborne was transferred to
> Nam extra MPs had to be stationed at the entrances to the dependent housing
> as the wives were having a really good time in their spouses absence. STDs
> aren't limited to prostitutes. The military should stick to
> teaching/endorsing safe sex practices and leave the rest alone..
>
>
I mentioned somewhere that adultery is already punishable (and I have known
people punished for it) under UCMJ... ... and I don't know of it ever going
to court martial, just a field grade Article 15.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5