From: "Andrealphus" 

In News gSGLh.25188$68.7841{at}bignews8.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky at
johndwentzky{at}alumni.furman.edu, typed this:

> In news:hsauv2lvq58gro8n19hp346de5hgagk1bm{at}4ax.com,
> Free Lunch  typed:
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:21:41 -0400, in alt.atheism
>> "John D.Wentzky"  wrote in
>> :
>>> In news:45ff283b$0$4884$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com,
>>> Dionisio  typed:
>>>> John D.Wentzky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> thomas p.  typed:
>>>>>> Not if the law is changed, and, in some places, it
has changed.
>>>>>
>>>>> By the constitutionally required process?
>>>>
>>>> Judicial review *is* a Constitutional thing.
>>>
>>> Of cases brought to court, not of laws that were constitutionally
>>> enacted. The judical branch is not the the "E" in E
Pluribus Unum.
>>>
>>>> Oops.
>>>
>>> Your idiocy is easily dismissed as high treason.
>>>
>> You clearly are ignorant of our Constitution. Please do not vote.
>
> You'd rather me be a candidate?

Sure, it would give the assassins a real target for a change.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag