From: "Geo." 

"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:415ed5a8$1{at}w3.nls.net...

> > I say we fire the asshole and get someone else in the whitehouse.

> Well that's your right to vote as you will.

thanks, I'm glad you are going to allow this..

> For me, given 9/11, I want a
> President who when faced with a tough choice comes down on the side of
> protecting us and preventing that nuke from going off in NYC.  Saddam had
> plenty and I mean PLENTY

Will you please get this thru your head, 9/11 and SADDAM are NOT CONNECTED!!!

I have no problem with how bush handled 9/11 and Afghanistan, that was not
a pre-emptive action it was a response to an act of war and it was fully
justified and everyone on the planet knew it.

Saddam was a totally separate issue, he did not attack the US, he did not
have the capability to attack the US, it is possible he funded some
terrorists but there is no proof of this, it is possible he was satan but
there is no proof of that either. The only intelligent way to view it in
the absense of any proof is that we unjustly attacked him and it is that
issue that forces me to vote against bush. It is OUR rule that says
innocent until proven guilty.

You want to change my mind, show me the WMD..

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5