CC> Another senario.  There is a major spill.  There is a sign 
CC> over the spill.  However, a person chooses to act like an 
CC> idiot, run through the resturaunt therefore slipping and 
CC> busting his/her head.  Should he/she be able to sue?
RT> scenario, if the signs are properly in place regarding the
RT> wet floor and someone neglects to heed them, they are at
RT> fault.  The key is the signs being properly in place so that
RT> they are readily seen from any angle of approach.
There is another thing to consider in this.  That is
whether or not the restaurant is attempting to remove
the spill.  If they are making a good faith effort to
remove the hazard and the hazard is well marked then
there should be no grounds for the suit.  If either of
these are missing there might be grounds.
                      Remember:  Freedom isn't Free!
--- timEd-B11
---------------