Hi Wes,
 FD>> Not according to what I've read.  It also has other
 FD>> changes that enhance thruput at lower speeds.
 WN> OK, Disable v.34+ (S56). Call another v.34 modem and see if your 
transfers
 WN> are any less robust.:-)
You're using semantics now.  It isn't just the 31.2 and 33.6 extensions that 
constitute v.34+.
 WN> In short, v.34+ has nothing to do with good code for the v.34
 WN> implementation. The v.34 code prior to the July flash was just not up to
 WN> it. The "other" enhancements were Srej, and them fixing the code.:-)
This doesn't agree with what I've read else where.  Where does your 
definition come from.
---
---------------