FS>    Congratulations on your new status.
     Thanks.
FS>    You might want to reconsider your feeling that there should be a
FS> conference rule requiring "meaningful subject lines."  I'm all for
FS> them,  but there isn't all that much room to spell out the subject
FS> and,  sometimes, the subject itself isn't all that clear.
     Well, I was saying that more tongue in cheek than
anything.  Rather than putting it in the SUBJ: line, it
could be a RE: WPDOS6.1 in the first line of the
message.  You'll have to admit it is sometimes pretty
frustrating at times.  A lot of times, someone asks a
question the answer to which depends on the version,
but since they don't state it, I don't bother
answering.
     It's gotten rather hard to read WordPerfect
Magazine for Dos lately.  This paragrapoh applies to
5.1, that to 5.1+, another to 6.0, and yet another to
6.1! Gets confusing to this old brain!
  FIDO: Bill White @ 1:135/110 (Miami)
 InterNet: bill.white@110.sunshine.com
 * SLMR 2.1a * Trust in God, but lock your car!
--- Maximus 2.01wb
---------------