From: "Geo." 

"Randy"  wrote in message news:45a304ed$1{at}w3.nls.net...

> Being employed in certain industries requires one to be fingerprinted as a
> condition of employment-right, wrong or indifferent.

Being employed might require it for access to certain weapons, materials,
and information. I can understand that because that makes sense to me. But
fingerprinting people because you want to track where they go regardless of
who they are or what they are doing is simply an huge invasion of privacy.

It would be an invasion of privacy if you had to be fingerprinted to enter
a walmart. See the difference?

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5